Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: Segfault with newer .zwc

X-seq: zsh-workers 24398
From: Clint Adams <schizo@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Segfault with newer .zwc
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 21:06:42 -0500
Cc: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200801100950.m0A9oN9T015070@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx>, zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <slrnfo4ov7.cgh.joerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080108095306.5475d009@news01> <20080109191236.GB32394@xxxxxxxxxxx> <200801100950.m0A9oN9T015070@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 09:50:23AM +0000, Peter Stephenson wrote:
> That's probably a sensible idea, though to avoid confusing is-at-least
> it would be best if it only appeared if there was a dev-N before it.

That shouldn't be a problem.

How about something like this?

Index: configure.ac
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/zsh/zsh/configure.ac,v
retrieving revision 1.87
diff -u -r1.87 configure.ac
--- configure.ac	14 Dec 2007 15:14:05 -0000	1.87
+++ configure.ac	15 Jan 2008 02:04:59 -0000
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
 
 dnl What version of zsh are we building ?
 . ${srcdir}/Config/version.mk
+VERSION="$VERSION$ZSH_EXTRAVERSION"
 echo "configuring for zsh $VERSION"
 
 dnl ----------------------------------------------

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Segfault with newer .zwc
  - From: Peter Stephenson

References:
- Segfault with newer .zwc
  - From: Jörg Sommer
- Re: Segfault with newer .zwc
  - From: Peter Stephenson
- Re: Segfault with newer .zwc
  - From: Clint Adams
- Re: Segfault with newer .zwc
  - From: Peter Stephenson

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author