Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: * Re: Failed tests of zsh 4.3.5 in Solaris 10 w/Sun Studio 12 CC
- X-seq: zsh-workers 24669
- From: Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx>
- To: "Zsh Hackers' List" <zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: * Re: Failed tests of zsh 4.3.5 in Solaris 10 w/Sun Studio 12 CC
- Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 12:59:49 +0000
- In-reply-to: <FC7FCD20-D9A8-484A-9D72-D9570FAC9D3E@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <8AABEECB-A9A6-43EA-BED2-4BE376CBE349@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080226141459.76dc362c@news01> <BD1EA7D6-C784-4ED9-9558-5B655CBC5096@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080226145741.6e74fc22@news01> <656429B3-438B-4ECF-85C4-04E38D837D1A@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200802261610.m1QGAwJ3008939@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <18951.1204047420@thecus> <200802271129.m1RBTVIC003639@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <28293.1204278804@thecus> <20080303120851.0c25f94f@news01> <FC7FCD20-D9A8-484A-9D72-D9570FAC9D3E@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
> > I wanted to be safe about that and as far as I can tell checking if
> > we get
> > _libiconv_version linked in should do that, right?
>
> I posted the libiconv-issues on the libiconv-list and got the
> following reply for reference:
Thanks, I think that means that what we've got is OK, but as things
stand we could get away with something simpler; unless someone has a
killer argument for the simpler #ifdef test I'll leave it as it is.
--
Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx> Software Engineer
CSR PLC, Churchill House, Cambridge Business Park, Cowley Road
Cambridge, CB4 0WZ, UK Tel: +44 (0)1223 692070
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author