Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: PATCH (?) Re: Regression in braces completion
- X-seq: zsh-workers 25888
- From: Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx>
- To: "Zsh Hackers' List" <zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: PATCH (?) Re: Regression in braces completion
- Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:45:12 +0100
- In-reply-to: <081013213720.ZM30875@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <20a807210810111932r1b32b746l3cca788a383e84ed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <081011213249.ZM29979@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <081012001051.ZM30706@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20081012204236.6669a668@pws-pc> <081012154721.ZM22722@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20081013100417.36870ba5@news01> <081013084328.ZM28630@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200810131627.m9DGRoED017498@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <081013213720.ZM30875@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Bart Schaefer wrote:
> Somebody tell me what's wrong with this. Doesn't seem to break spelling
> correction in the path prefix when braces are present, and doesn't seem
> to break braces when spelling correction isn't present, and doesn't add
> any new calls to compadd; just changes whether the ones that are there
> get -U passed in.
>
> What am I missing?
Presumably we won't know for months until somebody tries the completion
in question, but if this seems to fix all the obvious problems feel free
to commit it, since I wasn't going to have much time to look at
compresult.c anyway. (It might, for example, break spelling correction
where the prefix itself is in braces, but I don't feel particularly
moved to experiment.)
--
Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx> Software Engineer
CSR PLC, Churchill House, Cambridge Business Park, Cowley Road
Cambridge, CB4 0WZ, UK Tel: +44 (0)1223 692070
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author