Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: PATCH (?) Re: Regression in braces completion
- X-seq: zsh-workers 25899
- From: "Vin Shelton" <acs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Peter Stephenson" <pws@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: PATCH (?) Re: Regression in braces completion
- Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:34:35 -0400
- Cc: "Zsh Hackers' List" <zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=9mwrVmxNRdiG15xlhgnle21HT9LBg+7KnFDjTbAbzic=; b=Wemr1ZaX0f9B4h+lkYkkzq5OLD6TfmOmCEYSLjpuEXbZebcsWy1Xr/3vSiK+Q6BB0s 1G9YhDlhsx84VmRwAxWgDynJyh7fYhPDKFVZi31fh9xHcuiE/g3TjJIRnIjvYTWpDSu7 /3lbr3dF7RxtTvoyV5y8Xwf1yfvxrr+r5+khU=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=QKCvPxBJo8qLInDoeYv+nQ6FkloWy5i+5gM016HY4HQaX2kGh+hv22kIzJM1K1/3Y3 8UD8SXWyPkWRaPHkiYJnmyKpYcJRI4j0Gm3MqIQotRZsaTa8O8fDE5DNFuLP4CrF5Z14 R21uEjeKRYETVhvsKoRaHmxi6fk6ZaCSe/vOo=
- In-reply-to: <200810140845.m9E8jCDN025543@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <20a807210810111932r1b32b746l3cca788a383e84ed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <081011213249.ZM29979@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <081012001051.ZM30706@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20081012204236.6669a668@pws-pc> <081012154721.ZM22722@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20081013100417.36870ba5@news01> <081013084328.ZM28630@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200810131627.m9DGRoED017498@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <081013213720.ZM30875@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200810140845.m9E8jCDN025543@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: ethersoft@xxxxxxxxx
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 4:45 AM, Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Bart Schaefer wrote:
>> Somebody tell me what's wrong with this. Doesn't seem to break spelling
>> correction in the path prefix when braces are present, and doesn't seem
>> to break braces when spelling correction isn't present, and doesn't add
>> any new calls to compadd; just changes whether the ones that are there
>> get -U passed in.
>>
>> What am I missing?
>
> Presumably we won't know for months until somebody tries the completion
> in question, but if this seems to fix all the obvious problems feel free
> to commit it, since I wasn't going to have much time to look at
> compresult.c anyway. (It might, for example, break spelling correction
> where the prefix itself is in braces, but I don't feel particularly
> moved to experiment.)
>
Bart -
+1
Your patch worked for my case, but you probably already guessed that.
- Vin
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author