Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: zsh 4.3.9-dev-2, two test failures on NetBSD
- X-seq: zsh-workers 26865
- From: Paul Ackersviller <pda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: zsh 4.3.9-dev-2, two test failures on NetBSD
- Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 18:49:01 +0000
- In-reply-to: <20090421103537.76769226@news01>
- Mail-followup-to: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <26804.1239987872@xxxxxxx> <20090420040018.GA2989@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090420174808.40d3f9f9@news01> <20090420214822.GB2989@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090421103537.76769226@news01>
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:35:37AM +0100, Peter Stephenson wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 21:48:22 +0000
> Paul Ackersviller <pda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Thanks, you're right it was /bin/sh. The system turns out to have a
> > stty in /etc/profile that's really intended only for interactive shells.
> > The test is for login shells, so that makes sense. Could there be a way to
> > work around such breakage to /etc/profile? I can't think of anything easy.
>
> It might help to use zsh instead of sh here; zsh respects -f for login
> shells and all we need to know is whether the "-" is at the start of the
> line.
Perfect, that does get around the problem. I wasn't even aware -f had
that effect!
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author