Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: [PATCH] _git: Also complete FETCH_HEAD, ORIG_HEAD and MERGE_HEAD.
- X-seq: zsh-workers 27933
- From: Frank Terbeck <ft@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] _git: Also complete FETCH_HEAD, ORIG_HEAD and MERGE_HEAD.
- Date: Sat, 01 May 2010 12:46:00 +0200
- In-reply-to: <20100501082845.GA5704@xxxxxxxxxxxx> (Simon Ruderich's message of "Sat, 1 May 2010 10:28:45 +0200")
- List-help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
- List-id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
- List-post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <20100321172336.GA4151@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.LNX.2.01.1003211540430.19615@xxxxxxxxxxx> <dbfc82861003211317t7617b83ex2be594d2d994f328@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100322012544.GA6014@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.LNX.2.01.1003212134370.19615@xxxxxxxxxxx> <dbfc82861003220227i701893e8hee459c1fd72014d1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100329000715.GA25919@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100501082845.GA5704@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Simon Ruderich wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 02:07:15AM +0200, Simon Ruderich wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:27:29AM +0100, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
>>> Perhaps completing them all without checking if theyâre valid
>>> beforehand is the best solution?
>>
>> I think so too, it's simple and works. And as all these names are
>> uppercase they shouldn't interfere with normal completion.
>
> Could please somebody commit one of the possible solutions (I
> would prefer no forking if possible).
Um, I didn't follow this thread closely; which one? Benjamin's patch
from workers-27817Â?
Regards, Frank
 <http://www.zsh.org/mla/workers/2010/msg00269.html>
--
In protocol design, perfection has been reached not when there is
nothing left to add, but when there is nothing left to take away.
-- RFC 1925
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author