Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: [PATCH] better systemctl completion

X-seq: zsh-workers 29855
From: Frank Terbeck <ft@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] better systemctl completion
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 20:45:58 +0200
In-reply-to: <20111024122731.695d91fc@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> (Peter Stephenson's message of "Mon, 24 Oct 2011 12:27:31 +0100")
List-help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
List-id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <j81f58$q4i$1@dough.gmane.org> <20111024100147.1724c732@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> <4EA549D1.2040009@gmail.com> <20111024122731.695d91fc@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>

Peter Stephenson wrote:
[...]
> Sorry, my mistake.  I'll apply the patch.
[...]

Um. The file got a new licence as GPLv3 ("# This file is released under
the GPLv3."). I am obviously not a lawyer, but I know that we requested
a dual/relicencing before including an elaborate update for the `_hg'
completion function:

  <http://www.zsh.org/mla/workers//2007/msg01022.html>

I've seen that there a few files that mention the GPL in our repository
right now: Unix/Command/_darcs, Unix/Command/_osc,
openSUSE/Command/_osc, openSUSE/Command/_zypper.

I'd like to know what the policy WRT to licences of completion files
etc. is and/or if we are allowed to do that (I really have no idea).

Regards, Frank

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] better systemctl completion
  - From: Peter Stephenson

References:
- [PATCH] better systemctl completion
  - From: foudfou
- Re: [PATCH] better systemctl completion
  - From: Peter Stephenson
- Re: [PATCH] better systemctl completion
  - From: foudfou
- Re: [PATCH] better systemctl completion
  - From: Peter Stephenson

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author