Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: zsh 4.3.16

X-seq: zsh-workers 30249
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: zsh 4.3.16
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 20:12:05 -0800
Cc: "Zsh Hackers' List" <zsh-workers@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CAD77+gQiqPgs7qGOab-Ai-Hob1BB3AEAFSx_M7BwQRRHWBtGmw@mail.gmail.com>
List-help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
List-id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <20120219195359.7f3e301d@pws-pc.ntlworld.com> <120219144625.ZM21541@torch.brasslantern.com> <120219145406.ZM21556@torch.brasslantern.com> <120219145904.ZM21582@torch.brasslantern.com> <20120220103554.529613bc@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> <CAD77+gQiqPgs7qGOab-Ai-Hob1BB3AEAFSx_M7BwQRRHWBtGmw@mail.gmail.com>

On Feb 21,  6:52pm, Richard Hartmann wrote:
}
} We want to prepare a package for Debian and thus wanted to make sure
} we get the correct commit. ATM, we are betting on either [1] or [2],
} but would appreciate confirmation either way.

Those two are functionally identical, the only difference is a fixed
ChangeLog entry in [1].  However, I believe PWS was talking about doing
a 4.3.17 almost immediately to pick up [3], so you might want to wait
just a little longer.


} [1] http://zsh.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=zsh/zsh;a=commitdiff;h=5f25bb8223d090d13af5869893fa35e5b8c44182
} [2] http://zsh.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=zsh/zsh;a=commitdiff;h=66d61af2b5dcb5171ea96faedcccff0f045d6231


[3] http://zsh.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=zsh/zsh;a=commitdiff;h=15138d4fb7a40a1276722924b0482f53c83468f3

Follow-Ups:
- Re: zsh 4.3.16
  - From: Axel Beckert

References:
- Re: zsh 4.3.16
  - From: Peter Stephenson
- Re: zsh 4.3.16
  - From: Richard Hartmann

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author