Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: zsh 4.3.16
- X-seq: zsh-workers 30251
- From: Axel Beckert <abe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Zsh Hackers' List <zsh-workers@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: zsh 4.3.16
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 10:50:52 +0100
- Face: 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
- In-reply-to: <120221201205.ZM11125@torch.brasslantern.com>
- List-help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
- List-id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
- List-post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- Organization: DeuxChevaux.org -- The Citroën 2CV Database
- References: <20120219195359.7f3e301d@pws-pc.ntlworld.com> <120219144625.ZM21541@torch.brasslantern.com> <120219145406.ZM21556@torch.brasslantern.com> <120219145904.ZM21582@torch.brasslantern.com> <20120220103554.529613bc@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> <CAD77+gQiqPgs7qGOab-Ai-Hob1BB3AEAFSx_M7BwQRRHWBtGmw@mail.gmail.com> <120221201205.ZM11125@torch.brasslantern.com>
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 08:12:05PM -0800, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> On Feb 21, 6:52pm, Richard Hartmann wrote:
> } We want to prepare a package for Debian and thus wanted to make sure
> } we get the correct commit. ATM, we are betting on either [1] or [2],
> } but would appreciate confirmation either way.
>
> Those two are functionally identical, the only difference is a fixed
> ChangeLog entry in [1].
Yeah, figured that out as the tag is not missing in CVS, just in git.
> However, I believe PWS was talking about doing a 4.3.17 almost
> immediately to pick up [3], so you might want to wait just a little
> longer.
Well, too late. :-)
But I'm happy to upload a 4.3.17, too. :-)
Kind regards, Axel
--
/~\ Plain Text Ribbon Campaign | Axel Beckert
\ / Say No to HTML in E-Mail and News | abe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Mail)
X See http://www.asciiribbon.org/ | abe@xxxxxxxxx (Mail+Jabber)
/ \ I love long mails: http://email.is-not-s.ms/ | http://noone.org/abe/ (Web)
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author