Re: bug with eval, proc-subst and pipes

[Stephane Chazelas <stephane.chazelas@xxxxxxxxx>]

2013-07-17 20:17:33 +0100, Peter Stephenson:
[...]
> In that case, this patch does the exact equivalent.  I've made the
> entries in the temporary file list larger rather than adding a separate
> entry to the job since it should use less memory in general.
> 
> It seems to fix the completely reproducible variant.
[...]

Thanks,

for the record, in case it was not clear, it doesn't fix the
issue I reported initially.

Cheers,
Stephane