Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: SegFault in stringsubst

X-seq: zsh-workers 32554
From: Andrew Waldron <a.a.w@xxxxxx>
To: zsh workers <zsh-workers@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: SegFault in stringsubst
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 16:19:42 +1000
In-reply-to: <140415221511.ZM18252@torch.brasslantern.com>
List-help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
List-id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <20140416044612.GB24565@ewok> <140415221511.ZM18252@torch.brasslantern.com>

On Tue, 15 Apr 2014, Bart Schaefer wrote:

> The exec.c change doesn't change anything other than verbosity about some
> error conditions, correct?

Correct, if you take the change in stringsubst then there is no segfault.
You just end up with empty substitutions.

Regards
Andrew.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: SegFault in stringsubst
  - From: Bart Schaefer

References:
- SegFault in stringsubst
  - From: Andrew Waldron
- Re: SegFault in stringsubst
  - From: Bart Schaefer

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author