Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: SegFault in stringsubst
- X-seq: zsh-workers 32555
- From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh workers <zsh-workers@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: SegFault in stringsubst
- Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 09:13:11 -0700
- In-reply-to: <20140416061549.GA31591@ewok>
- List-help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
- List-id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
- List-post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <20140416044612.GB24565@ewok> <140415221511.ZM18252@torch.brasslantern.com> <20140416061549.GA31591@ewok>
On Apr 16, 4:19pm, Andrew Waldron wrote:
}
} On Tue, 15 Apr 2014, Bart Schaefer wrote:
}
} > The exec.c change doesn't change anything other than verbosity about some
} > error conditions, correct?
}
} Correct, if you take the change in stringsubst then there is no segfault.
} You just end up with empty substitutions.
Any second opinions on whether we want the increased verbosity? Peter?
--
Barton E. Schaefer
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author