Re: 5.0.8 regression when waiting for suspended jobs

[Peter Stephenson <p.w.stephenson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 18:56:31 -0700
Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> (1) Go for a minimal change of sending the SIGCONT only when !wait_cmd,
> which ends up with us blocking forever as with 5.0.7 and before (but
> blocked on signal_suspend() rather than busy-waiting, which is good).

I think I could live with this.

It's getting to the point where it doesn't look all that helpful to
agonise much further unless users have postgraduate degrees in job
control software.

pws