Re: [PATCH] _virsh (Was: Re: zsh virsh completion)

[Marko Myllynen <myllynen@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

On 2016-07-22 09:30, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Marko Myllynen wrote on Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 15:32:14 +0300:
>> On 2016-07-21 09:57, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>> Could you suggest how to clarify the man page section I quoted?
>>
>> Perhaps change "with both -s and -w, -xy may be the option -x and the
>> option -y with arguments still to come" to "... with arguments still to
>> come for -x"?
> 
> diff --git a/Doc/Zsh/compsys.yo b/Doc/Zsh/compsys.yo
> index 8792324..a50df99 100644
> --- a/Doc/Zsh/compsys.yo
> +++ b/Doc/Zsh/compsys.yo
> @@ -3591,8 +3591,9 @@ even if one or more of the options take
>  arguments.  For example, if tt(-x) takes an argument, with no
>  tt(-s), `tt(-xy)' is considered as a single (unhandled) option; with
>  tt(-s), tt(-xy) is an option with the argument `tt(y)'; with both tt(-s)
> -and tt(-w), tt(-xy) may be the option tt(-x) and the option tt(-y) with
> -arguments still to come.
> +and tt(-w), tt(-xy) is the option tt(-x) and the option tt(-y) with
> +arguments to tt(-x) (and to tt(-y), if it takes arguments) still to come
> +in subsequent words.
>  )
>  item(tt(-W))(
>  This option takes tt(-w) a stage further:  it is possible to

Thanks, this looks clear now.

Cheers,

-- 
Marko Myllynen