Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: compset -q oddities
- X-seq: zsh-workers 39354
- From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: compset -q oddities
- Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 17:40:39 -0700
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=brasslantern-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:date:in-reply-to:comments:references:to:subject :mime-version; bh=D19nAaXNdpzIoc97fLGugrqfqAaMf2yH/X6mJM2Z6jE=; b=mfu1NK2lXnCTzIHwXWiMHC1bLypbkVW5dEuvvDcn/FZzNwv1Ld47EddegulUvW4Chn nfezlN0e5db99V8dsFm09ymXZ4yM24pRWUNcp0X4mGWGLmG8h7CejgVVixLx4LM6PIl8 vYYJrQXW4lekdS/1vaevGeb2QWSZq47UGCm8j1isUb4drIy/vG5MgAnY3dynZyrTcDyT tW+wR2TRHrx+EMaaggStnlXGvawrUwBSlB+OdIzRsXc3eIJPp9Mhc/vDKv/XnuOggV+2 jNVXDuux/nYSssIFzgTgIlCHNL7FwVvWd6CkS01GUjpcTJ+MFdl4CCtwqdnFUP8p0Xei Q1/A==
- In-reply-to: <20160915051038.GA4568@fujitsu.shahaf.local2>
- List-help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
- List-id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
- List-post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <20160911073031.GA19137@fujitsu.shahaf.local2> <160911191422.ZM21970@torch.brasslantern.com> <20160912230632.GA29577@fujitsu.shahaf.local2> <CGME20160913063712eucas1p2deca64bf6437fe218152a2ced73328a4@eucas1p2.samsung.com> <160912232853.ZM27002@torch.brasslantern.com> <20160913112141.1243fbde@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> <160914105654.ZM29879@torch.brasslantern.com> <20160915051038.GA4568@fujitsu.shahaf.local2>
On Sep 15, 5:10am, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
} Subject: Re: compset -q oddities
}
} Bart Schaefer wrote on Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 10:56:54 -0700:
} > On Sep 13, 11:21am, Peter Stephenson wrote:
} > }
} > } However, I'm not sure we want to fiddle with this before a release
} >
} > I concur, we can e.g. note these issues in README or somewhere
}
} I'd write that docs patch but I don't understand what it should say?
I don't really know what to say either. It's been the way it is for
more than a decade without anybody noticing, so it could probably go
on this way without any documentation at all.
Or we could just write something in Etc/BUGS, which can simply note
the problem without attempting to explain what to do about it. Care
to check whether any of the other items in BUGS can be removed?
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author