Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: [PATCH] _describe and literal \n
- X-seq: zsh-workers 39588
- From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] _describe and literal \n
- Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2016 07:42:29 +0000
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= daniel.shahaf.name; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=7NtJZvx2LaxM+FjX9HRZRgNuuaI=; b=QkeQ0H mzxPVDP9wvO6ipZOy49p6pJ/AVwo4V++PZfhpAxqbta0DLgnStU0w/labUVl/pya /adFc/iOEePRAfi2XoBPfuS2xoviFsn6egepl2UDR/ihWv3JzRS5pk2shqT4Ksfp zg+MPbaqtMw9WBqKCpyRjfeHvfe1v5BOuta9g=
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=7NtJZvx2LaxM+FjX9HRZRgNuuaI=; b=F6sX+ JnkMvmdDGkRpG9ZwiIyDFBS1oudm+Oi6fHo1G84qpzY2n9A9BELXiikPNe8ZBYNj evR+h8SrjlqEofZznOUA0rxhJyXzWhWls6TnyWTVErXrresBHH8JHUySLbufX+kV zA9BdOhBvNjjDTLFprbGnSMQb132o3iCckDbpQ=
- In-reply-to: <161007075313.ZM19251@torch.brasslantern.com>
- List-help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
- List-id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
- List-post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <20160723180430.GA22451@tarsus.local2> <160723130059.ZM19333@torch.brasslantern.com> <20160723212345.GA2982@tarsus.local2> <5530.1469316428@hydra.kiddle.eu> <20160724213046.GB27932@tarsus.local2> <92023.1475008338@hydra.kiddle.eu> <20160929141139.GA5059@fujitsu.shahaf.local2> <20161007135044.GA13064@fujitsu.shahaf.local2> <161007075313.ZM19251@torch.brasslantern.com>
Bart Schaefer wrote on Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 07:53:13 -0700:
> On Oct 7, 1:50pm, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> } Subject: Re: [PATCH] _describe and literal \n
> }
> } Daniel Shahaf wrote on Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 14:11:39 +0000:
> } > compadd prints the description using nice*() functions, but _describe
> } > does its width computations using the raw string length
> }
> } I haven't forgotten about this; I'd like to review it again before
> } pushing, but haven't yet had time to do so.
>
> Your reasoning seems sound.
Thanks; it's not the reasoning that I want to review but whether my
s/strlen/nicelen/g surgery had any false positives or false negatives.
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author