On 12/11/2016 01:36 AM, Bart Schaefer wrote:
Not mine to say of course, I suspect that a message would be easy enough, but any complexities are to be avoided. I'm a spit and polish fanatic, polish it until it gleams. Not the culture in unix/linux tho -- I suppose something so huge can never be polished like we polished things in DOS.On Dec 10, 7:59pm, Ray Andrews wrote: } } Yabut there's a few other things that are very specific that they won't } run as superuser, so you know you needn't worry about them as the } messages are careful to explain. Shouldn't this one be similar? Ideally yes, but in this case we're re-running B02 from inside V10; B02 got changed without V10 being changed, so my question is, where do we fix it, or do we just not bother because running the tests as superuser is so unusual in the first place.