Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: [PATCH] 2 modules, zsh/db, zsh/gdbm, bug-fixes

X-seq: zsh-workers 41361
From: Sebastian Gniazdowski <psprint@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, zsh-workers@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2 modules, zsh/db, zsh/gdbm, bug-fixes
Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2017 13:22:13 +0200
In-reply-to: <etPan.594f6eec.c84cf44.63ea@zdharma.org>
List-help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
List-id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <etPan.594b8830.59cfcf4a.63ea@zdharma.org> <170623013643.ZM7546@torch.brasslantern.com> <etPan.594f6eec.c84cf44.63ea@zdharma.org>

On 25 czerwca 2017 at 10:06:04, Sebastian Gniazdowski (psprint@xxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> Sending state-of-art patch. Did multiple test runs on different machines (without 
> obvious reason, the code didn't change), as always.

Got hands on a new machine, medium-recent Arch Linux. Tests and Valgrind tests passed. I'm doing this broad-testing because nuances come up often, for VATS it was weird suffix added to static function (zgtie_cmd.istr8, something like that), for GDBM it was the NFS problem.

-- 
Sebastian Gniazdowski
psprint /at/ zdharma.org

References:
- [PATCH] 2 modules, zsh/db, zsh/gdbm, bug-fixes
  - From: Sebastian Gniazdowski
- Re: [PATCH] 2 modules, zsh/db, zsh/gdbm, bug-fixes
  - From: Bart Schaefer
- Re: [PATCH] 2 modules, zsh/db, zsh/gdbm, bug-fixes
  - From: Sebastian Gniazdowski

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author