Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: "set -e" handling is broken with zsh 5.3.1 and 5.4.1
- X-seq: zsh-workers 41615
- From: Peter Stephenson <p.w.stephenson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: "set -e" handling is broken with zsh 5.3.1 and 5.4.1
- Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 21:56:32 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ntlworld.com; s=meg.feb2017; t=1503953792; bh=2NTL3VF4J3pRxqWDzD2F6Dr1lgaAHth2E/NWNkncwAo=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=maLgdOg5eHLRfUdBI9QDrbZDxuX3Im3Z+Svsi0F9c63xUO4HOJdmvWZKSZhIQuP2q 80/BWV8VXbhYw9PXdBQYvpdjFq/hUlDCHCWLry1y89kigHOgcwmv5w2vdNoQErnkpb +zJCH9zGtV19mDSq5nWJHk0AA6BYZmOpjF4b4isCHucugCLsVc8C9NkeURaoKAqxMR wVoi+VX1+G42cfNfDQTwl2s3lMx2JKblgSKZtVrRexDpt6T7Lai5k98TtlLU2Q5dlz TFojMn6UJ8Au8uGjjm1Ic3gwZixPOUwBcS6+SmLpXGdI6JA/ilJLxM87iZ/S9UPHnR 5LXcsKoC6lIRA==
- In-reply-to: <CAH+w=7aEOC1sT94Lzko7xy-fSFy0R_RL09bXPWn79gVF+yN0UA@mail.gmail.com>
- List-help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
- List-id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
- List-post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <20170827005040.GA12622@zira.vinc17.org> <20170827195648.6f078249@ntlworld.com> <20170827222618.GA3398@zira.vinc17.org> <1503883531.3929330.1086829200.165C21BC@webmail.messagingengine.com> <CAH+w=7aEOC1sT94Lzko7xy-fSFy0R_RL09bXPWn79gVF+yN0UA@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, 27 Aug 2017 23:45:20 -0700
Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Background is in workers/34055 and 34059, and this looks to have
> something to do with noerrexit not propagating into the first sublist
> in a function body. It's entirely possible that the change from
> having a few numeric values for the flags to have a set of bit values
> has made that test unnecessary, or it may be needed in case that
> hasn't been tested yet -- the original report in 34055 involves
> calling a function within an if/else block.
I committed the chnage. The regression tests in C03ttraps.ztst are
still passing, and I couldn't see any simple code involving functions
that caused a failure. If someone finds one we will need to add it to
the tests.
pws
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author