Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: support more arguments to diff
- X-seq: zsh-workers 42677
- From: Eitan Adler <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: support more arguments to diff
- Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 17:37:56 -0700
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Mi1VQlhRmtUTNv4/HProYIJ3nGqTrkUfaigDH5Zxfew=; b=Y/IeLkQN0d/3W8MNgWyPCfnwLuD7ccD7Od/uCdHlLA4yMzpFwCwmCeveyxLwaozEQJ L5O3mnR62NjCHFjFB5oclCvkuqV3fTtUWwvenMdUZ9C9lhrmLXwnXYAkwjNV7RrFhfjb aRtLHeV5N2oj3u9aKgeBsevrADXmQbziJyOHA=
- In-reply-to: <20180417125307.GA34493@CptOrmolo.darkstar>
- List-help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
- List-id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
- List-post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
- List-unsubscribe: <mailto:zsh-workers-unsubscribe@zsh.org>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <CAF6rxgmh+N8VdjzN-jGA4QHPJANLkMJ-JZXChb-28DZxxLVa7Q@mail.gmail.com> <20180416145913.wv637mfnw5hfe2fi@Daniels-MacBook-Air.local> <CAF6rxgkmqUbAivhR6c3=RK4U_F2gY3ybebAjLgBnuqSmCyneeQ@mail.gmail.com> <20180417125307.GA34493@CptOrmolo.darkstar>
On 17 April 2018 at 05:53, Matthew Martin <phy1729@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 04:22:38AM -0700, Eitan Adler wrote:
>> On 16 April 2018 at 07:59, Daniel Tameling <tamelingdaniel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 10:48:08PM -0700, Eitan Adler wrote:
>> >> This patch isn't perfect since {Net,DragonFly,Open,Free}BSD are not
>> >> identical but this patch at leasts makes the completion a lot closer
>> >> to reality.
>> >>
>> >> Currently FreeBSD doesn't even show -q for example.
>> >>
>> >
>> > Did the patch change the behavior of diff completion for you? On my
>> > FreeBSD, diff is some GNU variant, and I think that it's the default
>> > and that I didn't install it via pkg:
>>
>> FreeBSD is in the process of converting to a new diff implementation.
>> This resulted in me seeing a huge difference with this patch.
>>
>> I'd also like to port this particular diff implementation to the other
>> BSDs, hence adding all of them to the case statement.
>
> I think it would be best to add the other cases as each BSD adopts
> whichever diff. I generally try to update the completion to match
> -current, so when a new release is picked up the options are correct.
I also wonder if we could just get rid of the OS test and replace it
with a pure version test. What if we run different verrsions than the
default?
--
Eitan Adler
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author