Re: Unreadable directories aren't included in glob expansion

["Daniel Shahaf" <d.s@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Jun T wrote on Tue, 03 Mar 2020 01:57 +00:00:
> 
> > 2020/02/28 23:55, Daniel Shahaf <d.s@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > Daniel Shahaf wrote on Fri, 28 Feb 2020 14:26 +0000:
> > 
> > Actually, it turns out that the test in question has already been fixed
> > on the 5.9 branch.  (I completely forgot about that before, sorry.  I only
> > ran into it now because I was trying to merge 5.9 into master.)
> > 
> > The fix is in commit edc04bd94656a152e17f06188bcef172d62a3ad4.
> > 
> > Could you check if D02 passes on the 5.9 branch on Cygwin?  If it does,
> > I'll merge master into 5.9, resolve the conflict on D02 by removing the
> > skip and leaving the test exit code and flags as "0:" (= pass), and then
> > merge 5.9 into master.
> 
> So you are going to fix the C code so that unreadable/unsearchable directory
> does match with "*/".
> 

Yes.  If you have any reservations about that, don't hesitate to raise them.

> On Cygwin, all of d000 d111 d444 match with */ on either master or 5.9
> branch. So the test D02 passes on 5.9 (with flag '0:').

Thanks.  I'll merge when I have time, but I don't know when I'll have time.

Cheers,

Daniel