Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: Patch management workflow for threads that peter out (was: Re: [PATCH] Fix [:IDENT:] vs posixidentifiers)

X-seq: zsh-workers 48308
From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Lawrence Velázquez <vq@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Patch management workflow for threads that peter out (was: Re: [PATCH] Fix [:IDENT:] vs posixidentifiers)
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 07:26:51 +0000
Archived-at: <https://zsh.org/workers/48308>
Archived-at: <http://www.zsh.org/sympa/arcsearch_id/zsh-workers/2021-03/20210329072651.GO18178%40tarpaulin.shahaf.local2>
In-reply-to: <CAH+w=7aHfkd_xbNq+tMrth4=g41v0rOnXWhv1Y8b9hVtr7qE-A@mail.gmail.com>
List-id: <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
References: <20201217150844.zkjydkeutae7cdpq@chazelas.org> <20210207155013.ean4tgv57uhn22nu@chazelas.org> <20210322171746.67pb332lvf3a3pkk@chazelas.org> <748AD4F6-A0D6-42D1-9E65-6C9028B8B69A@larryv.me> <20210325010654.GC18178@tarpaulin.shahaf.local2> <cb5c223f-4df9-4f6e-8fdd-1f62ec9cc8d1@www.fastmail.com> <20210329063014.GK18178@tarpaulin.shahaf.local2> <CAH+w=7aHfkd_xbNq+tMrth4=g41v0rOnXWhv1Y8b9hVtr7qE-A@mail.gmail.com>

Bart Schaefer wrote on Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 23:35:58 -0700:
> On Sun, Mar 28, 2021, 11:30 PM Daniel Shahaf <d.s@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> >
> > That does bring up the point of what to do with threads that peter out
> > without a review.  I suggest that they be added to Etc/BUGS.  WDYT?
> >
> 
> Only if they actually are threads about bug fixes.  Proposed new features
> or completion improvements, just as examples, don't belong in the BUGS file.

Are you objecting just to the name of the file, or to recording them at
all?  I.e., would recording them in an Etc/PROPOSED-NEW-FEATURES-AND-COMPLETION-IMPROVEMENTS
file be better?

Personally, I think I'd prefer a single file here, to remove a decision
step from anyone updating or consuming these files, but I don't feel
strongly about this.

Cheers,

Daniel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Patch management workflow for threads that peter out (was: Re: [PATCH] Fix [:IDENT:] vs posixidentifiers)
  - From: Lawrence Velázquez

References:
- Re: [PATCH] Fix [:IDENT:] vs posixidentifiers
  - From: Stephane Chazelas
- Re: [PATCH] Fix [:IDENT:] vs posixidentifiers
  - From: Stephane Chazelas
- Re: [PATCH] Fix [:IDENT:] vs posixidentifiers
  - From: Lawrence Velázquez
- Re: [PATCH] Fix [:IDENT:] vs posixidentifiers
  - From: Daniel Shahaf
- Re: [PATCH] Fix [:IDENT:] vs posixidentifiers
  - From: Lawrence Velázquez
- Patch management workflow for threads that peter out (was: Re: [PATCH] Fix [:IDENT:] vs posixidentifiers)
  - From: Daniel Shahaf
- Re: Patch management workflow for threads that peter out (was: Re: [PATCH] Fix [:IDENT:] vs posixidentifiers)
  - From: Bart Schaefer

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author