Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: sh emulation POSIX non-conformances (Was: [PATCH] Document imperfections in POSIX/sh compatibility)

X-seq: zsh-workers 48499
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: sh emulation POSIX non-conformances (Was: [PATCH] Document imperfections in POSIX/sh compatibility)
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2021 11:13:22 -0700
Archived-at: <https://zsh.org/workers/48499>
In-reply-to: <20210411175726.hxnm33mxoska2tsm@chazelas.org>
List-id: <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
References: <7FD930F4-37CD-402B-9A06-893818856199@dana.is> <CAH+w=7aAZKpT0f5LT7RaoCehyO6UZe6FimzuQqOP4o=+EwZs2w@mail.gmail.com> <F56FD538-0428-4D03-BBE2-6E53154EC0EA@dana.is> <CAH+w=7a6sjNJsDv4KJyW-o45+Q7GNEp7_TL4LGd-os1ozF8T9A@mail.gmail.com> <20210411175726.hxnm33mxoska2tsm@chazelas.org>

On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 10:58 AM Stephane Chazelas
<stephane@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Some non-POSIX conformances I can think of ATM:

Thanks for this list ... but POSIX conformance and /bin/sh
"replaceability" are not necessarily the same thing.

If I have time, I'll add failure tests for these to E03posix.ztst
(when that finally gets merged from declarednull).

References:
- [PATCH] Document imperfections in POSIX/sh compatibility
  - From: dana
- Re: [PATCH] Document imperfections in POSIX/sh compatibility
  - From: Bart Schaefer
- Re: [PATCH] Document imperfections in POSIX/sh compatibility
  - From: dana
- Re: [PATCH] Document imperfections in POSIX/sh compatibility
  - From: Bart Schaefer
- sh emulation POSIX non-conformances (Was: [PATCH] Document imperfections in POSIX/sh compatibility)
  - From: Stephane Chazelas

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author