Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Posted zsh 5.9
- X-seq: zsh-workers 50228
- From: dana <dana@xxxxxxx>
- To: "Daniel Shahaf" <d.s@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Cc: "Zsh hackers list" <zsh-workers@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Posted zsh 5.9
- Date: Sat, 14 May 2022 18:50:13 -0500
- Archived-at: <https://zsh.org/workers/50228>
- In-reply-to: <20220514232845.GC13240@tarpaulin.shahaf.local2>
- List-id: <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
- References: <25ece9e8-71fb-4cf4-adf1-1fbef7eda0a1@www.fastmail.com> <20220514215010.GI13508@tarpaulin.shahaf.local2> <734c6a79-86c8-4e29-9f4e-6c2267626390@www.fastmail.com> <20220514232845.GC13240@tarpaulin.shahaf.local2>
On Sat 14 May 2022, at 18:26, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Thanks. ENOTIME to update the creating-a-release.txt, sorry.
np, i'll do it tomorrow probably
On Sat 14 May 2022, at 18:26, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> I get "zsh-5.9.tar.xz.asc" with 1.20.1-1.1 (didn't test the other
> version this time).
Not sure then. It seems repeatable with the asc files for me here
On Sat 14 May 2022, at 18:28, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Can't they install the man pages shipped in the source tarball in --HEAD
> builds too?
Yeah, that's what i was saying in the third paragraph you quoted. But that
won't get them *all* the documentation like they have with bottles. They
would have to pull both the source *and* doc archives to do that (since
yodl is also needed to build the HTML files and those aren't included with
the source). Which they might be fine with, idk; it would just be faster
and more convenient if it was all in one place.
I don't personally care about having local HTML documentation, though, and
since SF only lets you have one 'latest' file (the source archive in our
case) maybe adding man and run-help to the doc archive isn't that useful to
Homebrew either. I'll just see if they can pull the man pages from the
'latest' file with --HEAD
dana
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author