Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: [PATCH?] Nofork and removing newlines
- X-seq: zsh-workers 52831
- From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [PATCH?] Nofork and removing newlines
- Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 00:05:50 -0700
- Archived-at: <https://zsh.org/workers/52831>
- In-reply-to: <31438-1710454547.652877@WxhA.vkY6.ljF0>
- List-id: <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
- References: <CAH+w=7aFJH-5GAu6puszGKvjqN-w0sPCi6v-vGPauDHVujDnag@mail.gmail.com> <20240305065606.ccr2ieheahslcpye@chazelas.org> <CAH+w=7Yb6_eULBq6Ez6pEhtUXOqErr+aDL2BDi7zyxr8QpsTiw@mail.gmail.com> <20240306175711.t3uz2sery3b6tbjw@chazelas.org> <CAH+w=7a5K8ioO+mP8RXvtmawHJFfFw1jOWE49GmZdAOVaTPjUQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAHYJk3Tmh0xVQodHuXycDDv21_xgkhq5hvGZgPrZbLUYox2bGA@mail.gmail.com> <CAH+w=7Yq7e7JOiN51=vQjUvS+Yi6xY0VAJUGjoraeBKKazAnkw@mail.gmail.com> <c053e1e2-b9e1-44af-aae4-4998e768e7ed@app.fastmail.com> <CAH+w=7b24HxJMGUBqjC7Fgx3ycLWwAuK0CTpwSSryb0XXxEHMw@mail.gmail.com> <90726-1709936102.086878@xlWC.oGpX.V4Q4> <CAH+w=7Zv1RsPoFBsLVjqS5wh0n4wQpsVQg3z2pKpfuYkjRk6CA@mail.gmail.com> <34739-1710017038.959920@XhYc.enDL.DTxr> <CAH+w=7Zk2usqyP1CtviobNZNnzAxhh_f5tnPdj-aLkBjX6B_cw@mail.gmail.com> <CAH+w=7Zb_PWs-h2J9uOUMT6TQXnfPUAXyCWZUEcKyyDx0fDLhg@mail.gmail.com> <25344-1710285573.990297@5-7t._0Mp.XRXG> <CAH+w=7aFbL8c=RLcrkKJU4R-o2ZhNJgS+zi60STswpFbE4BWqg@mail.gmail.com> <31438-1710454547.652877@WxhA.vkY6.ljF0>
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 3:15 PM Oliver Kiddle <opk@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Bart Schaefer wrote:
> > I hesitate in suggesting this, but ... is there any existing case in
> > which "${{" is valid? If not, I think I can change ${|var|...} to be
> > ${{var}...} without too much violence (except to the doc, bleah).
>
> [...] I marginally prefer ${{var}...}
> Certainly if it does involve much violence, what we currently have is
> working.
It was slightly more violent than I expected, and consequently there
is probably some room for optimization, but the attached has it
working (minus Doc update as yet).
Following workers/52635 the extra "TEST COMPLETE" test in D10 is not
really needed any more.
diff --git a/Src/lex.c b/Src/lex.c
index 31b130b07..700af2da1 100644
--- a/Src/lex.c
+++ b/Src/lex.c
@@ -1423,7 +1423,7 @@ gettokstr(int c, int sub)
if (lexstop)
break;
if (!cmdsubst && in_brace_param && act == LX2_STRING &&
- (c == '|' || c == Bar || inblank(c))) {
+ (c == '|' || c == Bar || c == '{' || c == Inbrace || inblank(c))) {
cmdsubst = in_brace_param;
cmdpush(CS_CURSH);
} else if (in_pattern == 2 && c != '/')
diff --git a/Src/subst.c b/Src/subst.c
index 9d20a2d0e..3764ed786 100644
--- a/Src/subst.c
+++ b/Src/subst.c
@@ -1898,11 +1898,10 @@ paramsubst(LinkList l, LinkNode n, char **str, int qt, int pf_flags,
*/
if (c == Inbrace) {
/* The command string to be run by ${|...;} */
- char *cmdarg = NULL;
+ char *cmdarg = NULL, *endvar = NULL, inchar = *++s;
size_t slen = 0;
int trim = (!EMULATION(EMULATE_ZSH)) ? 2 : !qt;
inbrace = 1;
- s++;
/* Short-path for the nofork command substitution ${|cmd;}
* See other comments about kludges for why this is here.
@@ -1913,43 +1912,74 @@ paramsubst(LinkList l, LinkNode n, char **str, int qt, int pf_flags,
* should not be part of command substitution in any case.
* Use ${(U)${|cmd;}} as you would for ${(U)$(cmd;)}.
*/
- if (*s == '|' || *s == Bar || inblank(*s)) {
+ if (inchar == '|' || inchar == Bar || inblank(inchar)) {
char *outbracep = s;
char sav = *s;
*s = Inbrace;
if (skipparens(Inbrace, Outbrace, &outbracep) == 0) {
slen = outbracep - s - 1;
if ((*s = sav) != Bar) {
+ /* This tokenize() is important */
sav = *outbracep;
*outbracep = '\0';
tokenize(s);
*outbracep = sav;
}
}
+ } else if (inchar == '{' || inchar == Inbrace) {
+ char *outbracep;
+ *s = Inbrace;
+
+ if ((outbracep = itype_end(s+1, INAMESPC, 0))) {
+ if (*outbracep == Inbrack &&
+ (outbracep = parse_subscript(++outbracep, 1, ']')))
+ ++outbracep;
+ }
+ /* True for valid substitution, or we messed up in lex.c */
+ if (outbracep && *outbracep == Outbrace) {
+ char outchar = inchar == Inbrace ? Outbrace : '}';
+ endvar = outbracep++;
+
+ /* Reached the first close brace, find the last */
+ *endvar = '|'; /* Almost anything but braces/brackets */
+ outbracep = s;
+ if (skipparens(Inbrace, outchar, &outbracep) == 0)
+ *endvar = Outbrace;
+ else { /* Never happens? */
+ *endvar = outchar;
+ outbracep = endvar + 1;
+ }
+ slen = outbracep - s - 1;
+ if (inchar != Inbrace) {
+ char sav = *outbracep;
+ *outbracep = '\0';
+ tokenize(s);
+ *outbracep = sav;
+ outbracep[-1] = Outbrace;
+ }
+ } else {
+ zerr("bad substitution");
+ return NULL;
+ }
}
if (slen > 1) {
char *outbracep = s + slen;
if (*outbracep == Outbrace) {
- if ((rplyvar = itype_end(s+1, INAMESPC, 0))) {
- if (*rplyvar == Inbrack &&
- (rplyvar = parse_subscript(++rplyvar, 1, ']')))
- ++rplyvar;
- }
- if (rplyvar == s+1 && *rplyvar == Bar) {
- /* Is ${||...} a subtitution error or a syntax error?
+ if (endvar == s+1 && !inblank(*endvar)) {
+ /* Is ${{}...} a substitution error or a syntax error?
zerr("bad substitution");
return NULL;
*/
rplyvar = NULL;
}
- if (rplyvar && *rplyvar == Bar) {
- cmdarg = dupstrpfx(rplyvar+1, outbracep-rplyvar-1);
- rplyvar = dupstrpfx(s+1,rplyvar-s-1);
+ if (endvar && *endvar == Outbrace) {
+ cmdarg = dupstrpfx(endvar+1, outbracep-endvar-1);
+ rplyvar = dupstrpfx(s+1,endvar-s-1);
} else {
cmdarg = dupstrpfx(s+1, outbracep-s-1);
rplyvar = "REPLY";
}
- if (inblank(*s)) {
+ if (inblank(inchar)) {
/*
* Admittedly a hack. Take advantage of the enforced
* locality of REPLY and the semantics of $(<file) to
diff --git a/Test/D10nofork.ztst b/Test/D10nofork.ztst
index fc6b84613..0616cf9e9 100644
--- a/Test/D10nofork.ztst
+++ b/Test/D10nofork.ztst
@@ -14,6 +14,28 @@
0:Basic substitution and REPLY scoping
>INNER OUTER
+ reply=(x OUTER x)
+ purl ${{reply}reply=(\{ INNER \})} $reply
+0:Basic substitution, brace quoting, and array result
+>{
+>INNER
+>}
+>{
+>INNER
+>}
+
+ () {
+ setopt localoptions ignorebraces
+ purl ${{reply} reply=({ INNER })} $reply
+ }
+0:Basic substitution, ignorebraces, and array result
+>{
+>INNER
+>}
+>{
+>INNER
+>}
+
purr ${| REPLY=first}:${| REPLY=second}:$REPLY
0:re-scoping of REPLY in one statement
>first:second:OUTER
@@ -229,7 +251,7 @@ F:Why not use this error in the previous case as well?
>26
unset reply
- purl ${|reply| reply=(1 2 ${| REPLY=3 } 4) }
+ purl ${{reply} reply=(1 2 ${| REPLY=3 } 4) }
typeset -p reply
0:array behavior with global assignment
>1
@@ -315,7 +337,7 @@ F:status of "print" should hide return
unset zz
outer=GLOBAL
- purr "${|zz|
+ purr "${{zz}
local outer=LOCAL
zz=NONLOCAL
} $outer $?"
@@ -453,6 +475,7 @@ F:must do this before evaluating the next test block
1:ignored braces, part 4
?(eval):3: parse error near `}'
+ unsetopt ignorebraces
# "break" blocks function calls in outer loop
# Could use print, but that might get fixed
repeat 3 do purr ${
@@ -467,11 +490,6 @@ F:must do this before evaluating the next test block
?1
?2
- print -u $ZTST_fd ${ZTST_testname}: TEST COMPLETE
-0:make sure we got to the end
-F:some tests might silently break the test harness
-
%clean
unfunction purr purl
- unsetopt ignorebraces
diff --git a/Test/V10private.ztst b/Test/V10private.ztst
index ed51316f3..26004a2dc 100644
--- a/Test/V10private.ztst
+++ b/Test/V10private.ztst
@@ -497,7 +497,7 @@ F:Better if caught in checkclobberparam() but exec.c doesn't know scope
() {
private z=outer
print ${(t)z} $z
- print ${| REPLY=${|z| z=nofork} }
+ print ${| REPLY=${{z} z=nofork} }
print ${(t)z} $z
}
0:nofork may write to private in calling function
@@ -518,9 +518,9 @@ F:Better if caught in checkclobberparam() but exec.c doesn't know scope
() {
private z=outer
print ${(t)z} $z
- print ${|z|
+ print ${{z}
private q
- z=${|q| q=nofork}
+ z=${{q} q=nofork}
}
print ${(t)z} $z
}
@@ -533,7 +533,7 @@ F:Better if caught in checkclobberparam() but exec.c doesn't know scope
print ${|
() { REPLY="{$q}" }
}
- print ${|q|
+ print ${{q}
() { q=nofork }
}
}
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author