Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: We've been sloppy about version numbering

X-seq: zsh-workers 53514
From: Peter Stephenson <p.w.stephenson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: We've been sloppy about version numbering
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 09:36:01 +0100 (BST)
Archived-at: <https://zsh.org/workers/53514>
Feedback-id: 20250425-p.w.stephenson@xxxxxxxxxxxx:oxsmtp-prd-nl-vmo:Authrelay:p.w.stephenson@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <d36f6dc9-6b72-469b-9150-3916b596ffe7@app.fastmail.com>
List-id: <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
References: <CAH+w=7bzJFq=eP_U1=LbwE4BSMcasFPP3PVZkenYAb42G5XHXQ@mail.gmail.com> <43a4b4ba22c9dff29e8adce110f251a9deced5ab.camel@ntlworld.com> <d36f6dc9-6b72-469b-9150-3916b596ffe7@app.fastmail.com>

> On 24/04/2025 21:59 BST dana <dana@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu 24 Apr 2025, at 15:35, Peter Stephenson wrote:
> > It's probably worth recording this.  (I thought the convention was
> > actually -dev-0 but I can't see any in the repository.)
> 
> it already mentions that, ctrl+f 'if the tagged'

You're right.  Maybe it could be moved to the end anyway as that's
the natural place and where you'd look if you're thinking 'hmm, is there
anything left..."?  Certainly I only did it right at the end after the
dust had settled.

pws

References:
- We've been sloppy about version numbering
  - From: Bart Schaefer
- Re: We've been sloppy about version numbering
  - From: Peter Stephenson
- Re: We've been sloppy about version numbering
  - From: dana

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author