Re: problem building zsh in background

[Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Nov 30, 10:08pm, Philippe Troin wrote:
}
} Okay, what about the following behavior:
} 
}  - keep the second patch (will fail if ran from cron or any other
}    situation where there is no ctty)
} 
}  - add a --with-working-tcsetpgrp / --without-working-tcsetpgrp switch
}    to force configure to skip the test (instead of failing) and assume
}    a working / non-working tcsetpgrp
} 
} Would that satisfy everyone?

Other than that it should just be --with-tcsetpgroup (what's the point of
"working"?  Is there a --with-broken-tcsetpgroup option?), I think that
sounds fine.