Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Rewrite of zsh-newuser-install (Mikael's subthread)
- X-seq: zsh-workers 48488
- From: Roman Perepelitsa <roman.perepelitsa@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Cc: dana <dana@xxxxxxx>, Marlon <marlon.richert@xxxxxxxxx>, Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Rewrite of zsh-newuser-install (Mikael's subthread)
- Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2021 00:03:18 +0200
- Archived-at: <https://zsh.org/workers/48488>
- In-reply-to: <CAH+w=7a4i1ozOFcLbqFdPm7=XTv08hEp_NvsQ9-HgakkQn=MWQ@mail.gmail.com>
- List-id: <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
- References: <CAHYJk3Sh8ErYyObh=nURosOnj4+bsB1WsxhOi_-e=n_1fjAQ6Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAH+w=7buB+hUY6ufROgGTRc4SPzqjRuO6e4vq2gU4q_UzJH=eg@mail.gmail.com> <FF8C7887-BA44-4317-AA7C-CB2F7296F078@gmail.com> <20210407162447.GB6316@tarpaulin.shahaf.local2> <15283D59-F7B5-4A4C-AFFA-B9D3BB46963F@gmail.com> <A6A66D59-5043-46C1-B3AB-05279CB895E1@dana.is> <CAH+w=7a4i1ozOFcLbqFdPm7=XTv08hEp_NvsQ9-HgakkQn=MWQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 11:42 PM Bart Schaefer
<schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 1:47 PM dana <dana@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > the proposed changes have gone beyond the scope i'd initially envisioned.
>
> Ditto.
Likewise. I've stopped commenting on this thread when it became
apparent that the size and complexity of the default zshrc I had in
mind is an order of magnitude lower than what's being discussed.
In my opinion, if zsh were to ship with a default zshrc (or generate
one via a wizard), it must be REALLY simple and REALLY short. If
someone wants to define a better zshrc with more functionality, let
them do so and compete with oh-my-zsh. It's much better for the
default zshrc to be too conservative than too complex.
Roman.
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author