Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: zshall.1

X-seq: zsh-workers 21925
From: Clint Adams <clint@xxxxxxx>
To: Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: zshall.1
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 09:30:18 -0400
Cc: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20051024130020.341f1235.pws@xxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx>, zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <20051024080141.GA18213@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <EXCHANGE03dgpyIb84V00007ae6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5ed187370510240452l26ce144cyf23d0b3c7decf259@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20051024130020.341f1235.pws@xxxxxxx>

> I suspect the feature you're using is slightly different, and you actually
> are expected to run the shell from where it's installed.  However, I've
> never had anything to do with the feature, so I can't be sure.  If anyone
> knows about it, they could help by saying.  Otherwise I'm inclined to
> assume you're right and massage zshall.1

Yes.  The DESTDIR stuff was added to handle an install to elsewhere for
packaging, and the transform/prefix/suffix stuff was for different
"flavors" coexisting.  I've just been munging zshall afterward.

References:
- zshall.1
  - From: Zvi Har'El
- Re: zshall.1
  - From: Peter Stephenson
- Re: zshall.1
  - From: Zvi Har'El
- Re: zshall.1
  - From: Peter Stephenson

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author